Domain name registration and website hosting packages at affordable rates since 1997.
March 18, 2018 19:38

You are browsing the archive for Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

#Nudelive : #WIPO panelist quotes #Namebio as the source of sales info in #UDRP with #RDNH finding

A UDRP filed against the domain name references sales data from “Nambio” in support of the Respodent’s case; the Complainant owns the .com. The panelist most likely meant to quote Namebio, that keeps track of domain sales across multiple venues. In the case of, the Complainant asserted they have previous rights to the […]

Read more

Kitchens To Go tries to reverse domain name hijack

Broker offered domain name for sale, which Kitchens To Go used as an opening to get domain below market value. Kitchens To Go, LLC has been found guilty of reverse domain name hijacking for a cybersquatting complaint it brought against the domain name The owner of died and left the domain names to […]

Read more

The company that took via UDRP is now getting sued for Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Last week I wrote about what I think will go down as one of the worst UDRP decisions in history. In case you missed this one, here’s a quick recap. Well-known Domain Name Investor and publisher of the incredibly popular website lost via UDRP. What made this so ridiculous (to me at least) […]

Read more

Dirty “Wedding Flea Market” guilty of reverse domain name hijacking

Like an angry bride that’s not getting what she wants, wedding flea market tries to hijack domain name. But Daddy! I want the singular version, not the plural! Wedding Flea Market, LLC, which uses the domain name (plural), has been found to have engaged in reverse domain name hijacking for the domain name […]

Read more

Wedding Flea Market : #Domain remains with owner, #RDNH finding in #UDRP

The owner of the domain can keep it, after the UDRP brought against their domain failed. Wedding Flea Market, LLC filed the UDRP on the basis of holding a US trademark for WEDDING FLEA MARKET – since September 26, 2017. The registrant of operates it since 2013, however. The Respondent pointed that fact […]

Read more

Voys B.V. tries to hijack domain name

Company that uses tried to get through a UDRP. A Dutch telecom company has been found to have engaged in reverse domain name hijacking for bringing a cybersquatting complaint against the owner of A three-person World Intellectual Property Organization panel determined that it filed its case in abuse of the policy. Among […]

Read more

#VOYS .com : Dutch company engaged in Reverse #Domain Name Hijacking

A Dutch company, Voys B.V. and Voys United B.V. of Groningen, Netherlands, filed a UDRP against the domain Registered in 2000, is a 4-letter .com that was acquired by the Respondent in 2008. Their domain portfolio consists of more than 1,000 such four letter domains. The Complainant cited the existence of two trademarks […]

Read more

Pest control company tried reverse domain name hijacking

Owner of EcoSmart filed cybersquatting dispute in abuse of policy. New formula comes with added reverse domain name hijacking. A National Arbitration Forum panelist has found Kittrich Corporation, owner of a line of pest control products called EcoSmart, to have engaged in reverse domain name hijacking over the domain name While the complainant has […]

Read more

De Lage Landen International B.V. tries reverse domain name hijacking

Financial firm blasted for frivilous cybersquatting dispute. DLL is a financial solutions partner, and apparently a reverse domain name hijacker, too. A World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) panelist has determined that De Lage Landen International B.V. attempted reverse domain name hijacking by filing a cybersquatting dispute against The company uses the domain name […]

Read more #UDRP : Reverse #domain name hijacking finding at the #WIPO

The UDRP against the domain has been decided upon, and the Complainant was found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. It’s interesting to note that the Respondent, at some point, asked for $100 million dollars in order to sell the domain to the Complainant! Full details of this decesion follow: WIPO Arbitration and […]

Read more